What are the three arguments concerning the Integration angle in Affirmative Action? (Name all three and explain)
*I was struggling to find out what the integration angle is…and when you explain can you please put it in simple terms so that I can understand pls :)
Explanation:
1). affirmative action...known as "positive discrimination..meaning, disadvanged groups should be judged by experience not color..as far as jobs..
arguments/ In a society that grew up with parents that "owned slaves", It was difficult 4 rich people 2 accept..hense..racism still exists..
2). Began as a government remedy 2 reform bosses from hiring just men...
3). outlawed hiring policies for economic preferences.
listed as 3 groups..high, medium, low...
found as discriminate ruling on personal, physical, mental understing..
I can prove that 2 + 2 is 5 there's the proof in the picture I also developed a new theory when I was in 3rd grade solving world hunger than you can use here to make 5
Answer: what answer is that
Explanation:
Donald, a mechanic at an auto shop, accidentally spilled some gasoline in the parking lot of the auto shop and failed to clean it up. Carl, a customer walking across the parking lot, flicked a lit cigarette onto the ground, hitting the gasoline and resulting in a fire that burned another customer, Val. Val suffered severe injuries to her legs. Can Donald be held liable in negligence for the harm to Val
Answer:
yes he can because he failed to clean up the gas and if he failed to clean it that means he did not clean it or he cleaned it but not the right way
so if had not cleaned it then yes he can
if he did clean it but not the right way he still can because he most likely new that it was not clean all the way because with out a doubt gas spelled on his side through out his owner ship of the auto shop so he should all ready know how to clean up gas so if he did not clean it up right he would know that, and since his carelessness led to that fire he can be heled liable
hope i helped
Explanation:
Am I legally allowed to own a pet asparagus in alabama
pls help I want a pet asparagus
Who appoints the justices? Who approves the justices? WHY?
Answer:
The President of the United State appoints justices, and have to be approved by the United States Senate; The reason is that the constitution states that all Presidential Appointees by the presidents are to be approved by the Senate. (By all it includes supreme court justices)
This will just require a simple majority; But during this point and Age, The philibuster mandates 60 Votes.
